2007 Civic 2.0S

Was "forced" to use this car cause the Omega was out of commission.

Drove it before, within the village and I was impressed with the handling and steering. But once out on the road a different kind of impression overtook me.
The car looks good, it is wide with an aggressive stance, so wide in fact that when it was parked beside our Evo VII it seemed that the car was as wide as the Evo (I think it really is). The 2.0S exclusive wheels certainly do a good job of showing off the 4 wheel disc brakes and they look good in their own right.


Steering feel is very good with a perfect amount of weight while turning the wheel, it doesn't feel over or underboosted. Only gripe about the steering is that at low speeds the quick ratio rack tends to be a little too quick ratio leading to a little dartiness. But once speeds are up the feel is fine, even when you go into a turn with some speed.


Engine response is superior compared to our previous Civic (01VTI-S). The word superior is used because our old VTI-S had a very sensitive pedal where a small tap would lead to lurching as IF the car had gobs of power or lordly engine response (Note to Honda, 1.6l engines do not have MAD TORKZ, dont try to fool me). Thankfully in the new Civic they seem to have fixed the lurching, with me finding it easy to set off without tensing my foot too much finding the right amount of pedal depression to avoid lurching. An additional bonus is that my feet dont feel so tired after a long journey modulating the pedal to achieve a comfortable drive.

Suspension: Feels solid with no untoward sounds, tire noise somewhat reared its head at around 50km/h which was a slight inconvenience considering the pricetag.
The suspension feels more planted than that of the old VTI-S particularly around the rear where the old car's rear tended to raise when braking, wag around while cornering and bottom out when going over bridges or raised sections of road. The new Civic's rear end feels more planted now with no untoward movements. The front end is another story, though it feels grippy, ride quality is not top notch and I oft noticed the front bobbing up and down while going through Commonwealth. I feel that the main cause of most of my gripes about ride quality and noise are due mostly to the fitment of 17 inch wheels with low profile tires on an econobox car. I want to try fitting the lower end Civic's 1.8 16 inch wheels with higher profile tires to see if ride comfort and road noise decreases.

Surprisingly the interior is quite good, with a quality feel all throughout, I specially like the dashboard with its soft touch plastics that lend an aura of quality to the car. Seating position is fine with no plus or minus points, and visibility is superb. Bonus points to the large sidemirrors that enable the driver to see what is beside his car using only his peripheral vision.

As I was driving I ranted about the car's value, I do not get the point of spending P1m+ for a bigger engine slapped into what basically is an economy car. Sure it is well engineered and lots of things are well thought out but I just cannot find a reason to pay that amount of money for this car.
First of all, the car appears pretentious, it fooled me into thinking that it is not an economy car. That it is a car that aspires for the driving dynamics of the 3 series BMW which is a good thing, but what is bad about those aspirations is that it raised my expectations about it and when those expectations are raised the car falls short and I was a bit... disappointed.

Secondly, the price tag at something north of P1m (with used examples hovering near P900k) I felt that money could be better spent on buying a good used German sedan like say an Opel Astra or a BMW 3 series.



Oh an addition, the longer I do not use this car the more it dawns on me that this car is a good con artist. Because it fools the driver into thinking that it is more powerful than it really is by crazily downshifting whenever you so much as touch the pedal. This hurts fuel economy and makes me feel pissed off. Granted that the lurching of the old VTI-S is gone but still it pisses me off that this car is not honest.

Addendum: having driven our 2004 Honda Accord 2.0 it seems as though Honda deliberately tweaked the software in the transmission to downshift much more than that of the accord in an attempt to give a feeling of sportyness. Sporty it is to some, annoying to me. Honda should have provided the car with a "sport mode" button for the transmission, but then you could argue that it has paddle shifters, but then I would counter with "do you paddle shift your way around city (shitty) traffic?".